Consulting control plane for AI coding agents

Your standards, versioned as code. Enforced across every agent and every IDE

Why AI Agents Need a Control Plane

AI coding agents are everywhere. Consistency and context are not.

Missed Conventions

Click to explore

Agents lack your architecture, business rules, and compliance requirements. They produce code that violates conventions, causing expensive rework and high rejection rates.

Instructions Don't Scale

Click to explore

Every engineer writes their own prompts — or none at all. Crafting effective instructions takes hours of work per task, they go stale fast, and there's no way to version, review, or govern them.

No Cross-IDE Reuse

Click to explore

Prompt libraries are IDE-specific and fragile. Switch from Cursor to Claude Code? Rewrite everything. New model drops? Start over. The same problem gets solved differently on every team.

Siloed Knowledge

Click to explore

Patterns proven in one project never reach others. Senior expertise stays in people's heads. Breaking changes cascade undetected across services because agents see one repo, not the system.

Rosetta solves this. One control plane that gives every agent the same context, standards, and workflows — across any IDE. See how it works →

Try Rosetta

Pick a scenario and see how Rosetta handles it step by step.

Select a scenario to start the demo

Get Started

Four steps to connect Rosetta to your IDE and start coding smarter.

Add Rosetta MCP to your IDE

Pick your editor. No local install needed — Rosetta connects over HTTP.

Cursor: Settings → Cursor Settings → MCP → Add new global MCP server or paste into ~/.cursor/mcp.json
Windsurf: add via MCP settings in IDE

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "Rosetta": {
      "url": "https://rosetta.evergreen.gcp.griddynamics.net/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Run this command in your terminal:

$ claude mcp add --transport http Rosetta \
    https://rosetta.evergreen.gcp.griddynamics.net/mcp

Run these commands in your terminal:

$ codex mcp add Rosetta \
    --url https://rosetta.evergreen.gcp.griddynamics.net/mcp
$ codex mcp login Rosetta

Add to .vscode/mcp.json or ~/.mcp.json:

{
  "servers": {
    "Rosetta": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://rosetta.evergreen.gcp.griddynamics.net/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Go to Settings → Tools → GitHub Copilot → MCP Settings, add to ~/.config/github-copilot/intellij/mcp.json:

{
  "servers": {
    "Rosetta": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://rosetta.evergreen.gcp.griddynamics.net/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Go to Settings → Tools → Junie → MCP Settings → + Add → As JSON:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "Rosetta": {
      "url": "https://rosetta.evergreen.gcp.griddynamics.net/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Add to your Antigravity MCP config file:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "Rosetta": {
      "url": "https://rosetta.evergreen.gcp.griddynamics.net/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Add to your opencode.json file:

{
  "mcp": {
    "Rosetta": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://rosetta.evergreen.gcp.griddynamics.net/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}

Complete OAuth

Your IDE will open a browser window to authenticate. Complete the OAuth flow when prompted.

Add Bootstrap Rule

Download bootstrap.md and add it to your IDE's instruction file. See Quick Start for file paths per IDE.

✓

Verify & Initialize

Restart your IDE, then verify Rosetta is connected:

# "What can you do, Rosetta?"

Then initialize your repository:

# "Initialize this repository using Rosetta"

Agent-agnostic by design. Use frontier-class models (Claude Sonnet/Opus, GPT-4o+, Gemini Pro) for best results.

Without Rosetta vs With Rosetta

Real enterprise cases. Same task — different results.

Without Rosetta

"Implement data changes from an Excel spec across two interconnected databases."

Started writing queries without understanding the full picture
Missed cross-schema relationships and dependent services
Ignored stored procedures, triggers, and legacy integrations
Produced partial SQL that would break downstream on deploy

Broken deploy. Hours of manual debugging.

With Rosetta

"Implement data changes from an Excel spec across two interconnected databases."

Loaded both database schemas and mapped every relationship
Identified all services and APIs depending on affected tables
Found missing fields and web services that needed updates
Discovered additional connections hidden in legacy COBOL code
Assembled full end-to-end implementation with all dependencies resolved

Complete implementation. Nothing missed — even legacy connections.

Without Rosetta

"Modernize this C++ service with Windows components into a new architecture."

Scanned a few files and suggested a generic rewrite
Missed Windows-specific dependencies and COM components
Couldn't determine what to reuse vs replace
Produced a vague spec — team still had to reverse-engineer the original

Spec full of gaps. Team starts over manually.

With Rosetta

"Modernize this C++ service with Windows components into a new architecture."

Systematically analyzed every class, method, and dependency
Mapped Windows components, libraries, and service boundaries
Determined what to reuse, what to replace, and what to drop
Created a target spec with interfaces, edge cases, and architecture decisions
Spec so precise that developers could ask AI follow-ups and get exact answers

Production-ready spec. Team moved straight to implementation.

Want the full picture?

Key concepts, session lifecycle, three-layer architecture, workflow patterns, and everything else in one place.

Docs